Prospective Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test for Screening of Asymptomatic Caregivers.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess clinical performance of a rapid antigen test (RAT) for screening asymptomatic patients during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) omicron outbreak. METHODS: RAT with the routine real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) using the same nasopharyngeal swab in universal transport medium was performed for rapid screening of asymptomatic caregivers of emergent patients from March to April 2022 in a tertiary-care hospital in Korea. Clinical performance of RAT compared to that analyzed by rRT-PCR was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 900 caregivers were enrolled in this study, of which 14 (1.6%) were RAT-positive and 44 (5.0%) were positive for rRT-PCR. Overall sensitivity and specificity of RAT were 31.8% and 100.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Caution must be taken when using RAT as a screening test for asymptomatic caregivers as this may lead to outbreaks among high-risk patients.

Evaluation of the cobas Liat detection test for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses following the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the clinical performance of the cobas Liat SARS­CoV­2 & Influenza A/B assay (LiatCOVID/flu) for the detection of both severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza viruses during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak. METHODS: Residual nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPS) previously tested with cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B for SARS-CoV-2 and with the Allplex Respiratory Panel 1 for influenza viruses were collected. All samples were submitted to the LiatCOVID/flu assay. RESULTS: A total of 1147 samples were collected comprising 167 SARS-CoV-2-positive, 556 SARS-CoV-2-negative, 224 influenza-positive, and 200 influenza-negative cases. The positive percent agreement (PPA)/negative percent agreement (NPA) of LiatCOVID/flu for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses compared to the previously tested methods were 100% of 100% and 99.6% of 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LiatCOVID/flu assay shows an acceptable performance in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses using NPS samples.

Guidelines for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Monkeypox in Korea.

While the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is ongoing, monkeypox has been rapidly spreading in non-endemic countries since May 2022. Accurate and rapid laboratory tests are essential for identifying and controlling monkeypox. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and the Korea Disease Prevention and Control Agency have proposed guidelines for diagnosing monkeypox in clinical laboratories in Korea. These guidelines cover the type of tests, selection of specimens, collection of specimens, diagnostic methods, interpretation of test results, and biosafety. Molecular tests are recommended as confirmatory tests. Skin lesion specimens are recommended for testing in the symptomatic stage, and the collection of both blood and oropharyngeal swabs is recommended in the presymptomatic or prodromal stage.

Patterns of Possible False-Positive Results for Three Commercial Real-Time PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively examined all initial positive SARS-CoV-2 test results using three real-time PCR tests from patients without a history of COVID-19 collected from September to October 2021 at a university-affiliated hospital. METHODS: We defined a possible false-positive (PFP) case as a positive case that showed negative results upon per-forming a confirmatory test on the same specimen. Positivity% and PFP% were defined as the number of first positive and the number of PFP cases divided by the total test numbers, respectively. RESULTS: The positivity%/PFP% values were 0.76%/0.10%, 0.29%/0.02%, and 0.21%/0.03% for the Xpert, Allplex, and cobas tests, respectively. Six (75%) cobas PFP cases were RdRp-only positive. All PFP cases analyzed by Xpert except one had cycle threshold values ≥ 40. Contamination during extraction was suspected in five of the 10 PFP cases analyzed by Allplex, which requires a separate extraction step. CONCLUSIONS: Care must be taken when analyzing first-positive cases as these may be false-positive signals.

SARS-CoV-2 shedding dynamics and transmission in immunosuppressed patients.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern have been emerging. However, knowledge of temporal and spatial dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 is limited. This study characterized SARS-CoV-2 evolution in immunosuppressed patients with long-term SARS-CoV-2 shedding for 73-250 days, without specific treatment. We conducted whole-genome sequencing of 27 serial samples, including 26 serial samples collected from various anatomic sites of two patients and the first positive sample from patient 2's mother. We analysed the intrahost temporal dynamics and genomic diversity of the viral population within different sample types. Intrahost variants emerging during infection showed diversity between individual hosts. Remarkably, N501Y, P681R, and E484K, key substitutions within spike protein, emerged in vivo during infection and became the dominant population. P681R, which had not yet been detected in the publicly available genome in Korea, appeared within patient 1 during infection. Mutually exclusive substitutions at residues R346 (R346S and R346I) and E484 (E484K and E484A) of spike protein and continuous turnover of these substitutions occurred. Unique genetic changes were observed in urine samples. A household transmission from patient 2 to his mother, at least 38 days after the diagnosis, was characterized. Viruses may differently mutate and adjust to the host selective pressure, which could enable the virus to replicate efficiently for fitness in each host. Intrahost variants could be candidate variants likely to spread to the population eventually. Our findings may provide new insights into the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in response to interactions between the virus and host.

Update of Guidelines for Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Korea.

Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and the Korea Disease Prevention and Control Agency have announced guidelines for diagnosing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in clinical laboratories in Korea. With the ongoing pandemic, we propose an update of the previous guidelines based on new scientific data. This update includes recommendations for tests that were not included in the previous guidelines, including the rapid molecular test, antigen test, antibody test, and self-collected specimens, and a revision of the previous recommendations. This update will aid clinical laboratories in performing laboratory tests for diagnosing COVID-19.

Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widely used in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by diverse variants. Information on the real-world performance of RATs for variants is urgently needed for decision makers. Systematic searches of the available literature and updates were conducted in PubMed, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, CENTRAL, and KMBASE for articles evaluating the accuracy of instrument-free RATs for variants up until 14 March 2022. A bivariate random effects model was utilized to calculate pooled diagnostic values in comparison with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. A total of 7562 samples from six studies were available for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of RATs for variants were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.5% to 76.1%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100.0%), respectively. When an additional 2179 samples from seven studies reporting sensitivities only were assessed, the pooled sensitivity dropped to 50.0% (95% CI = 44.0% to 55.0%). These findings suggest reassessment and monitoring of the diagnostic utility of RATs for variants, especially for the sensitivity aspect, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of Intra- and Interlaboratory Variations in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time RT-PCR Through Nationwide Proficiency Testing.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the intra- and interlaboratory variations of cycle threshold (Ct) values using the nationwide proficiency testing for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Triplicated strong-positive contrived samples duplicated weak-positive contrived samples, and 2 negative samples were transported to participating laboratories in October 2021. RESULTS: A total of 232 laboratories responded. All except 4 laboratories correctly answered. Six false-negative results, including 2 false-negatives with Ct values beyond the threshold and 1 clerical error, were noted from weak-positive samples. Intralaboratory variations of Ct values of weak-positive and strong-positive samples were not acceptable (Ct > 1.66) in 17 and 7 laboratories, respectively. High interlaboratory variations of Ct values (up to 7 cycles) for the 2 commonly used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reagents were observed. CONCLUSION: The overall qualitative performance was acceptable; intralaboratory variation was acceptable. However, interlaboratory variations of Ct values were remarkable even when the same PCR reagents were used.

Heterologous ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 vaccination in Korean cohort induces robust immune and antibody responses that includes Omicron.

Heterologous ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 vaccination induces a stronger immune response than BNT162b2-BNT162b2. Here, we investigated the molecular transcriptome, germline allelic variants of immunoglobulin loci, and anti-Omicron antibody levels in 46 office and lab workers from the Republic of Korea following ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 vaccination. Anti-spike-specific IgG antibody levels against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain increased from 70 AU/ml to 14,000 AU/ml to 142,000 AU/ml one, three and seven days following the second vaccination. Titers against VOC, including Omicron, were two-fold to three-fold lower, yet higher than those measured following BNT162b2-BNT162b2 vaccination. RNA-seq of peripheral immune cells demonstrated activation of interferon pathways with increased IGHV clonal transcripts encoding neutralizing antibodies. scRNA-seq revealed enriched B cell and CD4+ T cell responses in both ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 and BNT162b2-BNT162b2 recipients, but a stronger clonal expansion of memory B cells with ChAdOx1-BNT162b2. In summary, heterologous ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 provides an innate and adaptive immune response that exceeds homologous BNT162b2 vaccination.

Cost analysis of coronavirus disease 2019 test strategies using pooled reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction technique

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the testing strategies for COVID‐19 (i.e., individual, simple pooling, and matrix pooling) in terms of cost.MethodsWe simulated the total expenditures of each testing strategy for running 10,000 tests. Three parameters were used: positive rate (PR), pool size, and test cost. We compared the total testing costs under two hypothetical scenarios in South Korea. We also simulated country‐specific circumstances in India, South Africa, South Korea, the UK, and the USA.ResultsAt extreme PRs of 0.01% and 10%, simple pooling was the most economic option and resulted in cost reductions of 98.0% (pool size ≥80) and 36.7% (pool size = 3), respectively. At moderate PRs of 0.1%, 1%, 2%, and 5%, the matrix pooling strategy was the most economic option and resulted in cost reductions of 97.0% (pool size ≥88), 86.1% (pool size = 22), 77.9% (pool size = 14), and 59.2% (pool size = 7), respectively. In both hypothetical scenarios of South Korea, simple pooling costs less than matrix pooling. However, the preferable options for achieving cost savings differed depending on each country's cost per test and PRs.ConclusionsBoth pooling strategies resulted in notable cost reductions compared with individual testing in most scenarios pertinent to real‐life situations. The appropriate type of testing strategy should be chosen by considering the PR of COVID‐19 in the community and the test cost while using an appropriate pooling size such as five specimens.

Fluvoxamine Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic COVID-19 in a Community Treatment Center: A Preliminary Result of Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether fluvoxamine reduces clinical deterioration in adult patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to identify risk factors for clinical deterioration in patients admitted to a community treatment center (CTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a CTC, in Seoul, Korea from January 15, 2021, to February 19, 2021. Symptomatic adult patients with positive results of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 real time-polymerase chain reaction within 3 days of randomization were assigned at random to receive 100 mg of fluvoxamine or placebo twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration defined by any of the following criteria: oxygen requirement to keep oxygen saturation over 94.0%, aggravation of pneumonia with dyspnea, or World Health Organization clinical progression scale 4 or greater. RESULTS: Of 52 randomized participants [median (interquartile range) age, 53.5 (43.3 - 60.0) years; 31 (60.0%) men], 44 (85.0%) completed the trial. Clinical deterioration occurred in 2 of 26 patients in each group (P >0.99). There were no serious adverse events in either group. Clinical deterioration occurred in 15 (6.0%) of 271 patients admitted to the CTC, and all of them were transferred to a hospital. In multivariate analysis, age between 55 and 64, fever and pneumonia at admission were independent risk factors for clinical deterioration. CONCLUSION: In this study of adult patients with symptomatic COVID-19 who were admitted to the CTC, there was no significant differences in clinical deterioration between patients treated with fluvoxamine and placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04711863).

Simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and identification of spike D614G mutation using point-of-care real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with high mortality and infectivity rates in humans since its emergence. Analysis using high-accuracy real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is recommended for the detection of general respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2, but it takes a long time (e.g. ~ 6 h); moreover, on-site diagnosis is difficult owing to the need for skilled technicians and advanced laboratory facilities. Currently, the importance of point-of-care testing (POCT) is being emphasized for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we developed a multiplex real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) analysis that not only detects SARS-CoV-2 but also D614G strains with higher contagiousness than wild types among SARS-CoV-2 mutants using probe-based rRT-PCR. Moreover, this method was applied to portable PCR equipment capable of POCT to confirm high detection sensitivity and specificity. Multiple assays were possible with fluorescence labeling of individual probes. Furthermore, using a microfluidic chip-based point-of-care testing rRT-PCR platform, detection time was reduced by more than half compared with the commonly used detection system. This demonstrates that our assay has 100% of high sensitivity and specificity and could thus aid in the rapid and simple screening of SARS-CoV-2 carrying the mutation. We present a rapid detection method for mutations in SARS-CoV-2.

Prevalence of a Single-Nucleotide Variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Korea and Its Impact on the Diagnostic Sensitivity of the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay.

The sensitivity of molecular diagnostics could be affected by nucleotide variants in pathogen genes, and the sites affected by such variants should be monitored. We report a single-nucleotide variant (SNV) in the nucleocapsid (N) gene of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), i.e., G29179T, which impairs the diagnostic sensitivity of the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). We observed significant differences between the threshold cycle (Ct) values for envelope (E) and N genes and confirmed the SNV as the cause of the differences using Sanger sequencing. This SNV, G29179T, is the most prevalent in Korea and is associated with the B.1.497 virus lineage, which is dominant in Korea. Clinical laboratories should be aware of the various SNVs in the SARS-CoV-2 genome and consider their potential effects on the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019.

Clinical Performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test and Simulation of its Real-World Application in Korea.

The rapid antigen test (RAT) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) represents a potent diagnostic method in situations of limited molecular testing resources. However, considerable performance variance has been reported with the RAT. We evaluated the clinical performance of Standard Q COVID-19 RAT (SQ-RAT; SD Biosensor, Suwon, Korea), the first RAT approved by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. In total, 680 nasopharyngeal swabs previously tested using real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) were retested using SQ-RAT. The clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT relative to that of rRT-PCR was 28.7% for all specimens and was 81.4% for specimens with RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (RdRp) threshold cycle (Ct) values ≤23.37, which is the limit of detection of SQ-RAT. The specificity was 100%. The clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT for COVID-19 diagnosis was assessed based on the Ct distribution at diagnosis of 33,294 COVID-19 cases in Korea extracted from the laboratory surveillance system of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT for COVID-19 diagnosis in the Korean population was 41.8%. Considering the molecular testing capacity in Korea, use of the RAT for COVID-19 diagnosis appears to be limited.